Left or Right?
It really doesn't matter if you're a moron. But being a leftist is still worse.
Herd mentality works both ways. What I’ve ultimately noticed is that Left wing people tend to quickly and unashamedly espouse moral cowardice and behave in ways that affirm this consistently. Leftists behave like high school mean girls, so they are inherently feminized, but in a rather strong toxic version of femininity (GSR - Gossiping Shaming Rallying).
Envy is also very common with the idiot Leftist. Most of their animus in fact, seems to spring from this. So while they affirm this supposed higher consciousness of the world, it is in fact an unfortunate result of their poor ability to parse environmental threats. They are lemmings, but also extremely petty people who possess at the base of their urges, this all-consuming need to take things they haven’t earned.
Not saying people on the Right don’t do similarly stupid and entitled things because I’ve seen them being petty to similar degrees. They just seem less retarded most days. But you can immediately tell their world view is strictly a la carte, based on whatever existing peer pressures they are subjected to. And apart from a vapid observance of God as a moral authority, they don’t really have a sincere world view, they merely employ it as cover for their own improprieties, which the Left is very keen on pointing out to them. Two retards fighting, in essence. Entertaining, but increasingly dangerous as current times indicate. The cognitive dissonance with the average conservative can be as strong as the average woke, but for different reasons, possibly more legitimate ones, as they are more loyal to those close to them, which is evolutionarily recommended. Leftists have very poor self-preservation, that’s why they look dumber overall in how they talk and sure end up looking dumb in outcomes. But if these two get in a fight, they’re really not fighting in our reality. They fight in spite of it, to everyone else’s detriment.
What’s actually terrifying about this, is that most people you know are dumb and worse: They hate you just by looking at you. It’s sinister when you don’t even understand why. It’s like they’re angry, demon possessed children, under the surface as they try to wrangle that deranged toddler from view in social interactions. I can see this CONSTANTLY in other people. You should understand that these cases you doubtlessly are confronted with on the regular (assuming you’re not the idiot to whom the shoe fits and is about to insult me in the comments because you have no emotional control), ultimately are a representation of the lowest common denominator. These are your ‘zombies’, per George Romero’s allegory. But even the Left’s highest socio-economic samples don’t impress, that’s probably why everyone thinks the Left is worse. Their elites are fucking deranged and moronic and they actually believe the stuff they do in the culture and in the pulpit looks good. Yikes, talk about overconfidence in the stupid. It may just be that they don’t have ubermensch at all on the Left and only the Right is capable of producing masculine, capable, sharp and ultimately rational leaders who play intelligently into the natural selection struggle, by having a clear talent for threat assessment. But more importantly: CAUSAL context as to why things are the way they are, which is at the very core of the lowest common denominator’s existential inefficiency. Unavoidably so.
There’s a reason we have ethics and it wasn’t the average joe shmoe off the street who came up with those. Philosophers conceptualized these under the strict observance of cause and effect. Without bias. This requires the ability to depersonalize the observer. No solipsism occurs here. In order to be objective about the predictable impact of any cause, you can’t afford to have that reflex because you obviously don’t want anything happen to you. That bias is powerful. That’s why ethics were created by the classical Age thinkers, who had less neurotic existentialist “noise” in their lives. Nature was a lot more present for them. They could easily remove themselves from the causal process to observe it for what it was, uncontaminated by fears or feelings. It is by all means transcendentalism - the only one of any consequence for real world outcomes because from it came our ethics, therefore our system of values and our laws. It’s actually a big fucking deal.
When leftists tell you they are “unbiased”, they are lying. What they are telling you in truth, is that they overcame the empirical observations of that which is causal and switched from that vital and rather difficult to master descriptive reflex, into an entirely prescriptive one.
Any idiot can tell you “oughts”. Very few people can tell you straight that which “is”.
No wonder morons coalesce predominantly in that alignment. It’s very easy to have silly wishes as to what the world should be.
People who operate entirely on prescriptions fall on the same group as Dunning-Kruger Effect brainlets. Ultra confident in their cursory knowledge of matters, disastrously unprepared for reality. In natural selection terms, these majority people, out of both groups, are simply not meant to survive. So why do they? That’s the existential asymmetry of humans, in how they organize to stave off needless cruelty. Some of us are to be as lesser gods to all the fools who really only think they understand their reality. They live it poorly and in disconnected glimpses of sobriety. It never truly sticks. They will always need help: Leaders. Those who, by virtue of discipline and depersonalization, can truly dabble in seeing how things function in the world. They become that which is and determine what works and what doesn’t. Actual problem solving, absent the human factor. This is why things like Democracies can never work, you silly leftists. This is why, rather than talking about rights, we should be talking about ROLES. To direct energy in ways that are productive, instead of scattering it, by the ineptitude of the masses. Societies with clear assigned roles to individuals are inherently hierarchical and unerringly so, ensuring everyone finds their way, even if sometimes they don’t exactly know why. They couldn’t know because most people simply DO NOT think that way about things, at all. And that doesn’t have to be bad. But it definitely has to be curbed.
We, who are not as others, should inherently take stock of what things are and ignore all the stupid people who are consistently threatened by us. They will try everything they can to make sure we do not attain “power”, which is what they truly care about in outcomes. Fools like this don’t understand that some of us out here are trying to do it PROPERLY. Not out of ego, but to ensure things function for everyone. Because they can, provided reality is the compass for Mankind, not stupid, petty wishes of fame and riches.
Thank you for coming to my TED talk.




Thought provoking article.
As a Christian, I try to govern my worldview by the Bible. I don’t do it perfectly, I need to work on doing it more, but it’s what I try to do.
That means I try not to see things as Left or Right, but as biblical and unbiblical. Generally, the platform on the right tends to align more with biblical principles. That doesn’t make me an enthusiastic right winger. Sometimes I can get caught up in narratives, and my team vs. their team, which is the incorrect way to go about these things. There’s plenty of things on the right that I don’t like or agree with. But there’s many more things on the left that I don’t like or agree with, based on my worldview and how I try to live my life.
I can't say I agree with everything here but it is presented with controlled passion. I aspire to avoid politics at all costs because, as you point out, both sides are idiots. Seeing things clearly for what they are is absolutely necessary and totally deficient in the world. Thank you for giving me some deep things to think about today!